|
|
Post by baggs on Dec 21, 2021 15:54:42 GMT
Okay, you insist prog after a certain date is worthless. You paint it all with a broad brush.
I'm not going to disagree with you , or attempt to poke holes in your certainties, but...
WHAT EVIDENCE COULD CONVINCE YOU TO CHANGE YOUR MIND.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2021 14:02:05 GMT
No you are still trying to push your views. Many reasons i personally favour early Prog.
Destruction lies with:
FASHION
INSTRUMENT TECHNOLOGY
RECORDING TECHNOLOGY
Influence is the wrong road to travel down because it spells disaster at the end of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by baggs on Dec 23, 2021 15:41:13 GMT
"FASHION INSTRUMENT TECHNOLOGY RECORDING TECHNOLOGY" So then nothing to do with actual MUSICIANSHIP,COMPOSITION?  gOTTA SAY i WASN'T EXPECTING FASHION IN THERE. rEALLY? wOT GET UP the band is wearing and stage backdrops are that important ? You gotta be taking the piss. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2021 16:34:58 GMT
Music runs with fashion. Its a fact. I can just hear the music style of the time in bands music, this is proof enough that sound is of fashion at the time. I can tell the sound of an synth in the particular era which tells me what era it is LOL. A prime example would be Emerson GX1 which totally transformed their sound. If there was no outside influence, no new Instrument, no new studio techniques then say ELP music should sound the same from 1970 - 1978 then no?
|
|
|
|
Post by baggs on Dec 28, 2021 15:36:30 GMT
I can rell how wide the flares are by the tone of the guitar.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2021 21:06:45 GMT
Dont be sarcastic. Your just not accepting that music & fashion run hand in hand.
|
|
